Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: survive in a low-memory situation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Qian,

On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:08:49AM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> Kmemleak could quickly fail to allocate an object structure and then
> disable itself in a low-memory situation. For example, running a mmap()
> workload triggering swapping and OOM [1].
> 
> First, it unnecessarily attempt to allocate even though the tracking
> object is NULL in kmem_cache_alloc(). For example,
> 
> alloc_io
>   bio_alloc_bioset
>     mempool_alloc
>       mempool_alloc_slab
>         kmem_cache_alloc
>           slab_alloc_node
>             __slab_alloc <-- could return NULL
>             slab_post_alloc_hook
>               kmemleak_alloc_recursive

kmemleak_alloc() only continues with the kmemleak_object allocation if
the given pointer is not NULL.

> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 4190c24ef0e9..51a9a942cc56 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -435,15 +435,16 @@ static inline void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
>  {
>  	size_t i;
>  
> -	flags &= gfp_allowed_mask;
> -	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> -		void *object = p[i];
> -
> -		kmemleak_alloc_recursive(object, s->object_size, 1,
> -					 s->flags, flags);
> -		p[i] = kasan_slab_alloc(s, object, flags);
> +	if (*p) {
> +		flags &= gfp_allowed_mask;
> +		for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> +			void *object = p[i];
> +
> +			kmemleak_alloc_recursive(object, s->object_size, 1,
> +						 s->flags, flags);
> +			p[i] = kasan_slab_alloc(s, object, flags);
> +		}
>  	}

This is not necessary for kmemleak.

-- 
Catalin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux