Re: [Bug 202089] New: transparent hugepage not compatable with madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 12:53:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> (switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> bugzilla web interface).
> 
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:00:22 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202089
> > 
> >             Bug ID: 202089
> >            Summary: transparent hugepage not compatable with
> >                     madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)
> >            Product: Memory Management
> >            Version: 2.5
> >     Kernel Version: 4.4.0-117
> >           Hardware: x86-64
> >                 OS: Linux
> >               Tree: Mainline
> >             Status: NEW
> >           Severity: high
> >           Priority: P1
> >          Component: Other
> >           Assignee: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >           Reporter: jianpanlanyue@xxxxxxx
> >         Regression: No
> > 
> > environment:  
> >   1.kernel 4.4.0 on x86_64
> >   2.echo always > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enable
> >     echo always > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag
> >     echo 2000000 > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/pages_to_scan
> > ( faster defrag pages to reproduce problem)
> > 
> > problem: 
> >   1. use mmap() to allocate 4096 bytes for 1024*512 times (4096*1024*512=2G).
> >   2. use madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) to free most of the above pages, but reserve a
> > few pages(by if(i%33==0) continue;), then process's physical memory firstly
> > come down, but after a few seconds, it rise back to 2G again, and can't come
> > down forever.
> >   3. if i delete this condition(if(i%33==0) continue;) or disable
> > transparent_hugepage by setting 'enable' and 'defrag' to never, all go well and
> > the physical memory can come down expectly.
> > 
> >   It seems like transparent_hugepage has problems with non-contiguous
> > madvise(MADV_DONTEED).

It's expected behaviour.

MADV_DONTNEED doesn't guarantee that the range will not be repopulated
(with or without direct action on application behalf). It's just a hint
for the kernel.

For sparse mappings, consider using MADV_NOHUGEPAGE.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux