On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:39:39PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > Yes, you are missing that this code should be as sane as possible ;) You > are right that we are only processing one pageorder worth of pfns and > that the page order is bound to HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER _right_now_. But > there is absolutely zero reason to hardcode that assumption into a > simple loop, right? Of course, it makes sense to keep the code as sane as possible. This is why I said I was not against the change, but I wanted to see if I was missing something else besides the assumption. Thanks -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3
