On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:55:31AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 12/15/18 12:03 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > release_pages() is a simpler version of free_unref_page_list() but it
> > tracks the highest PFN for caching the restart point of the compaction
> > free scanner. This patch optionally tracks the highest PFN in the core
> > helper and converts compaction to use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
>
> Nit below:
>
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -2961,18 +2961,26 @@ void free_unref_page(struct page *page)
> > /*
> > * Free a list of 0-order pages
> > */
> > -void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> > +void __free_page_list(struct list_head *list, bool dropref,
> > + unsigned long *highest_pfn)
> > {
> > struct page *page, *next;
> > unsigned long flags, pfn;
> > int batch_count = 0;
> >
> > + if (highest_pfn)
> > + *highest_pfn = 0;
> > +
> > /* Prepare pages for freeing */
> > list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, list, lru) {
> > + if (dropref)
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!put_page_testzero(page));
>
> That will warn just once, but then page will remain with elevated count
> and free_unref_page_prepare() will warn either immediately or later
> depending on DEBUG_VM, for each page.
> Also IIRC it's legal for basically anyone to do get_page_unless_zero()
> and later put_page(), and this would now cause warning. Maybe just test
> for put_page_testzero() result without warning, and continue? Hm but
> then we should still do a list_del() and that becomes racy after
> dropping our ref...
>
While there are cases where such a pattern is legal, this function
simply does not expect it and the callers do not violate the rule. If it
ever gets a new user that makes mistakes, they'll get the warning. Sure,
the page leaks but it'll be in a state where it's unsafe to do anything
else with it.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
