ping ?
On 2018/12/13 10:18, Hou Tao wrote:
> ping ?
>
> On 2018/12/6 9:14, Hou Tao wrote:
>> ping ?
>>
>> On 2018/12/4 10:08, Hou Tao wrote:
>>> There is no need to disable __GFP_FS in ->readpage:
>>> * It's a read-only fs, so there will be no dirty/writeback page and
>>> there will be no deadlock against the caller's locked page
>>> * It just allocates one page, so compaction will not be invoked
>>> * It doesn't take any inode lock, so the reclamation of inode will be fine
>>>
>>> And no __GFP_FS may lead to hang in __alloc_pages_slowpath() if a
>>> squashfs page fault occurs in the context of a memory hogger, because
>>> the hogger will not be killed due to the logic in __alloc_pages_may_oom().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> fs/squashfs/file.c | 3 ++-
>>> fs/squashfs/file_direct.c | 4 +++-
>>> fs/squashfs/squashfs_fs_f.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 fs/squashfs/squashfs_fs_f.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/squashfs/file.c b/fs/squashfs/file.c
>>> index f1c1430ae721..8603dda4a719 100644
>>> --- a/fs/squashfs/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/squashfs/file.c
>>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>>> #include "squashfs_fs.h"
>>> #include "squashfs_fs_sb.h"
>>> #include "squashfs_fs_i.h"
>>> +#include "squashfs_fs_f.h"
>>> #include "squashfs.h"
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -414,7 +415,7 @@ void squashfs_copy_cache(struct page *page, struct squashfs_cache_entry *buffer,
>>> TRACE("bytes %d, i %d, available_bytes %d\n", bytes, i, avail);
>>>
>>> push_page = (i == page->index) ? page :
>>> - grab_cache_page_nowait(page->mapping, i);
>>> + squashfs_grab_cache_page_nowait(page->mapping, i);
>>>
>>> if (!push_page)
>>> continue;
>>> diff --git a/fs/squashfs/file_direct.c b/fs/squashfs/file_direct.c
>>> index 80db1b86a27c..a0fdd6215348 100644
>>> --- a/fs/squashfs/file_direct.c
>>> +++ b/fs/squashfs/file_direct.c
>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>> #include "squashfs_fs.h"
>>> #include "squashfs_fs_sb.h"
>>> #include "squashfs_fs_i.h"
>>> +#include "squashfs_fs_f.h"
>>> #include "squashfs.h"
>>> #include "page_actor.h"
>>>
>>> @@ -60,7 +61,8 @@ int squashfs_readpage_block(struct page *target_page, u64 block, int bsize,
>>> /* Try to grab all the pages covered by the Squashfs block */
>>> for (missing_pages = 0, i = 0, n = start_index; i < pages; i++, n++) {
>>> page[i] = (n == target_page->index) ? target_page :
>>> - grab_cache_page_nowait(target_page->mapping, n);
>>> + squashfs_grab_cache_page_nowait(
>>> + target_page->mapping, n);
>>>
>>> if (page[i] == NULL) {
>>> missing_pages++;
>>> diff --git a/fs/squashfs/squashfs_fs_f.h b/fs/squashfs/squashfs_fs_f.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..fc5fb7aeb27d
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/fs/squashfs/squashfs_fs_f.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +#ifndef SQUASHFS_FS_F
>>> +#define SQUASHFS_FS_F
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * No need to use FGP_NOFS here:
>>> + * 1. It's a read-only fs, so there will be no dirty/writeback page and
>>> + * there will be no deadlock against the caller's locked page.
>>> + * 2. It just allocates one page, so compaction will not be invoked.
>>> + * 3. It doesn't take any inode lock, so the reclamation of inode
>>> + * will be fine.
>>> + *
>>> + * And GFP_NOFS may lead to infinite loop in __alloc_pages_slowpath() if a
>>> + * squashfs page fault occurs in the context of a memory hogger, because
>>> + * the hogger will not be killed due to the logic in __alloc_pages_may_oom().
>>> + */
>>> +static inline struct page *
>>> +squashfs_grab_cache_page_nowait(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index)
>>> +{
>>> + return pagecache_get_page(mapping, index,
>>> + FGP_LOCK|FGP_CREAT|FGP_NOWAIT,
>>> + mapping_gfp_mask(mapping));
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
> .
>
