Re: Very aggressive memory reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi John,

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:50:56PM +0400, John Lepikhin wrote:
> 2011/3/28 Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@xxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > I'd take a look here:
> > http://www.linuxinsight.com/proc_sys_vm_hierarchy.html
> 
> Yes, I already played with dirty_*, min_free_kbytes (3000kb),
> swappiness (0..100), vfs_cache_pressure (1..200) and zone_reclaim_mode
> (currently 0). Other parameters are set to defaults.
> 
> By the way, there is no swap enabled. Instead of just dropping 50% of
> page caches, kernel was intensively swapping then there was a swap
> device.

Is your memory usage balanced across the nodes? You can check it via
/sys/devices/system/node/node*/meminfo.

Are there lots of high-order memory allocations?  /proc/buddyinfo will
disclose some of them.

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]