On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:55:17PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > There are use cases where we want to allow nesting of one terminal lock > underneath another terminal-like lock. That new lock type is called > nestable terminal lock which can optionally allow the acquisition of > no more than one regular (non-nestable) terminal lock underneath it. I think I asked for a more coherent changelog on this. The above is still self contradictory and doesn't explain why you'd ever want such a 'misfeature' :-)
