Re: [Lsf] [LSF][MM] page allocation & direct reclaim latency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/29/2011 03:05 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

Should the latency issues be discussed in that track?

Sounds good.  I don't think we'll spend more than 5-10 minutes
on the latency thing, probably less than that.

The MM schedule has still a free slot 14-14:30 on Monday, I wonder if
there's interest on a "NUMA automatic migration and scheduling
awareness" topic or if it's still too vapourware for a real topic and
we should keep it for offtrack discussions,

I believe that problem is complex enough to warrant a 30
minute discussion.  Even if we do not come up with solutions,
it would be a good start if we could all agree on the problem.

Things this complex often end up getting shot down later, not
because people do not agree on the solution, but because people
do not agree on the PROBLEM (and the patches in question only
solve a subset of the problem).

I would be willing to lead the NUMA scheduling and memory
allocation discussion.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]