On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 12:18:01 -0800 Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 12:14:43PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:22:34 -0500 Tony Battersby <tonyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On 11/13/18 1:36 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:46:35AM -0500, Tony Battersby wrote: > > > >> Prevent a possible endless loop with DMAPOOL_DEBUG enabled if a buggy > > > >> driver corrupts DMA pool memory. > > > >> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I like it! Also, here you're using blks_per_alloc in a way which isn't > > > > normally in the performance path, but might be with the right config > > > > options. With that, I withdraw my objection to the previous patch and > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Andrew, can you funnel these in through your tree? If you'd rather not, > > > > I don't mind stuffing them into a git tree and asking Linus to pull > > > > for 4.21. > > > > > > > No reply for 3 weeks, so adding Andrew Morton to recipient list. > > > > > > Andrew, I have 9 dmapool patches ready for merging in 4.21. See Matthew > > > Wilcox's request above. > > > > > > > I'll take a look, but I see that this v4 series has several review > > comments from Matthew which remain unresponded to. Please attend to > > that. > > I only had a review comment on 8/9, which I then withdrew during my review > of patch 9/9. Unless I missed something during my re-review of my responses? And in 0/9, that 1.3MB allocation. Maybe it's using kvmalloc, I didn't look.
