On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 04:05:04AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: >On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 02:38:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: >> Forgot to mention that this should probably go to stable. Having an >> incorrect nr_zones might result in all sorts of problems which would be >> quite hard to debug (e.g. reclaim not considering the movable zone). >> I do not expect many users would suffer from this it but still this is >> trivial and obviously right thing to do so backporting to the stable >> tree shouldn't be harmful (last famous words). >> >> Cc: stable # since 4.13 >> >> older tress would have to be checked explicitly. > >While the final commit included Michal's response, it didn't have a >stable tag. Could someone confirm it should go in stable? > I think Michal wants it into stable. >-- >Thanks, >Sasha -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
