Can you check if the brute force patch below helps? If it does I
still need to refine it a bit, but it could be that we are doing
an allocation under an xfs lock that could recurse back into the
filesystem. We have a per-process flag to disable that for normal
kmalloc allocation, but we lost it for vmalloc in the commit you
bisected the regression to.
Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/kmem.h
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/kmem.h 2011-03-29 21:16:58.039224236 +0200
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/kmem.h 2011-03-29 21:17:08.368223598 +0200
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline void *kmem_zalloc_large(si
{
void *ptr;
- ptr = vmalloc(size);
+ ptr = __vmalloc(size, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_HIGHMEM, PAGE_KERNEL);
if (ptr)
memset(ptr, 0, size);
return ptr;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>