On 30.11.18 13:06, Jan Stancek wrote: > LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes > on arm64: > page_mapped+0x78/0xb4 > stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338 > kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164 > proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8 > __vfs_read+0x58/0x178 > vfs_read+0x90/0x14c > SyS_read+0x60/0xc0 > > Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not > huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page > (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running > (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory > that isn't mapped and triggers a panic: > for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) { > if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0) > return true; > } > > I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only > with a custom kernel module [1] which: > - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1 > - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff > (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0) > - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page > - second page of COPY is marked as not present > - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd > COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount) > > [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c > > Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages. > > Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> > Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/util.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Changes in v2: > - change the loop instead so we check also mapcount of subpages > > diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c > index 8bf08b5b5760..5c9c7359ee8a 100644 > --- a/mm/util.c > +++ b/mm/util.c > @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ bool page_mapped(struct page *page) > return true; > if (PageHuge(page)) > return false; > - for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < (1 << compound_order(page)); i++) { > if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0) > return true; > } > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Thanks, David / dhildenb