On Fri 30-11-18 15:36:51, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:18:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 30-11-18 13:06:57, Jan Stancek wrote: > > > LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes > > > on arm64: > > > page_mapped+0x78/0xb4 > > > stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338 > > > kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164 > > > proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8 > > > __vfs_read+0x58/0x178 > > > vfs_read+0x90/0x14c > > > SyS_read+0x60/0xc0 > > > > > > Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not > > > huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page > > > (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running > > > (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory > > > that isn't mapped and triggers a panic: > > > for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) { > > > if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0) > > > return true; > > > } > > > > > > I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only > > > with a custom kernel module [1] which: > > > - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1 > > > - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff > > > (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0) > > > - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page > > > - second page of COPY is marked as not present > > > - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd > > > COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount) > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c > > > > > > Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages. > > > > This is much less magic than the previous version. It is still not clear > > to me how is mapping higher order pages to page tables other than THP > > though. So a more detailed information about the source would bre really > > welcome. Once we know that we can add a Fixes tag and also mark the > > patch for stable because that sounds like a stable material. > > IIRC, sound subsystem can producuce custom mapped compound pages. Do I assume correctly that consecutive ptes simply point to subpages? > The bug dates back to e1534ae95004. Thanks for the pointer. I thought this was a new and creative usage of the pte->page mapping but it really looks like your commit just changed the underlying semantic. > > > Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The patch looks sensible to me > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > -- > Kirill A. Shutemov -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs