On 11/29/18 1:52 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 05:48:25PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote: >> BTW, in 4.19+ the counter has been renamed and exported by >> the commit b29940c1abd7 ("mm: rename and change semantics of >> nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes"), so there is no such a problem >> anymore. >> >> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.14.x-4.18.x >> Fixes: 7aaf77272358 ("mm: don't show nr_indirectly_reclaimable in /proc/vmstat") ... > I do not see this patch in Linus's tree, do you? > > If not, what am I supposed to do with this? Yeah it wasn't probably clear enough, but this is stable-only patch, as upstream avoided the (then-unknown) problem in 4.19 as part of a far more intrusive series. As I've said in my previous reply to this thread, I don't think we can backport that series to stable (e.g. it introduces a set of new kmalloc caches that will suddenly appear in /proc/slabinfo) so I think this is a case for exception from the stable rules. Vlastimil > confused, > > greg k-h >