> On Nov 27, 2018, at 5:06 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 27, 2018, at 4:07 PM, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Sometimes when memory is freed via the module subsystem, an executable
>> permissioned TLB entry can remain to a freed page. If the page is re-used to
>> back an address that will receive data from userspace, it can result in user
>> data being mapped as executable in the kernel. The root of this behavior is
>> vfree lazily flushing the TLB, but not lazily freeing the underlying pages.
>>
>> There are sort of three categories of this which show up across modules, bpf,
>> kprobes and ftrace:
>>
>> 1. When executable memory is touched and then immediatly freed
>>
>> This shows up in a couple error conditions in the module loader and BPF JIT
>> compiler.
>
> Interesting!
>
> Note that this may cause conflict with "x86: avoid W^X being broken during
> modules loading”, which I recently submitted.
I actually have not looked on the vmalloc() code too much recent, but it
seems … strange:
void vm_unmap_aliases(void)
{
...
mutex_lock(&vmap_purge_lock);
purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus();
if (!__purge_vmap_area_lazy(start, end) && flush)
flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
mutex_unlock(&vmap_purge_lock);
}
Since __purge_vmap_area_lazy() releases the memory, it seems there is a time
window between the release of the region and the TLB flush, in which the
area can be allocated for another purpose. This can result in a
(theoretical) correctness issue. No?
