Re: [PATCH] mm, sparse: drop pgdat_resize_lock in sparse_add/remove_one_section()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[I am mostly offline and will be so tomorrow as well]

On Tue 27-11-18 08:52:14, osalvador@xxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
> So, although removing the lock here is pretty straightforward, it does not
> really get us closer to that goal IMHO, if that is what we want to do in the
> end.

But it doesn't get us further either, right? This patch shouldn't make
any plan for range locking any worse. Both adding and removing a sparse
section is pfn range defined unless I am missing something.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux