Re: [PATCH] mm, hotplug: protect nr_zones with pgdat_resize_lock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On the other hand I would like to see the global lock to go away because
it causes scalability issues and I would like to change it to a range
lock. This would make this race possible.

That being said this is more of a preparatory work than a fix. One could
argue that pgdat resize lock is abused here but I am not convinced a
dedicated lock is much better. We do take this lock already and spanning
its scope seems reasonable. An update to the documentation is due.

Would not make more sense to move it within the pgdat lock
in move_pfn_range_to_zone?
The call from free_area_init_core is safe as we are single-thread there.

And if we want to move towards a range locking, I even think it would be more consistent if we move it within the zone's span lock (which is already wrapped with a pgdat lock).







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux