On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:09:26AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Mon 12-11-18 15:14:04, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Zone with no managed_pages doesn't contribute totalreserv_pages. And the
>> more nodes we have, the more empty zones there are.
>>
>> This patch skip the zones to save some cycles.
>
>What is the motivation for the patch? Does it really cause any
>measurable difference in performance?
>
The motivation here is to reduce some unnecessary work.
Based on my understanding, almost every node has empty zones, since
zones within a node are ordered in monotonic increasing memory address.
The worst case is all zones has managed_pages. For example, there is
only one node, or configured to have only ZONE_NORMAL and
ZONE_MOVABLE. Otherwise, the more node/zone we have, the more empty
zones there are.
I didn't have detail tests on this patch, since I don't have machine
with large numa nodes. While compared with the following ten lines of
code, this check to skip them is worthwhile to me.
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index a919ba5cb3c8..567de15e1106 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -7246,6 +7246,9 @@ static void calculate_totalreserve_pages(void)
>> struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
>> long max = 0;
>>
>> + if (!managed_zone(zone))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> /* Find valid and maximum lowmem_reserve in the zone */
>> for (j = i; j < MAX_NR_ZONES; j++) {
>> if (zone->lowmem_reserve[j] > max)
>> --
>> 2.15.1
>>
>
>--
>Michal Hocko
>SUSE Labs
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
