On (11/08/18 21:44), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > If lockdep and OOM people will ACK buffered printk transition in > its current form, then we can go ahead. That printk_safe approach in lockdep, BTW, does not change (convert) any printk-s within lockdep, thus Peter's earlycon should not be affected. So Peter will have earlycon working, syzbot folks will have buffered lockdep print outs. -ss
