* Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >From dd1534455196d2a8f6c9c912db614e59986c9f0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:59:35 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] x86: Early boot alternative instructions hm, patch is whitespace damaged. Also, the fix looks rather intrusive. Could we please disable the lockless slub code first and then do everything with proper testing and re-enable the lockless code *after* we know that the alternatives fixup change is robust, etc? That way there's no rush needed. There's a lot of code that could break from tweaking the alternatives code. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>