On (11/06/18 09:38), Petr Mladek wrote: > > If you would want to avoid buffering, you could set the number > of buffers to zero. Then it would always fallback to > the direct printk(). This printk-fallback makes me wonder if 'cont' really can ever go away. We would totally break cont printk-s that trapped into printk-fallback; as opposed to current sometimes-cont-works-just-fine. -ss
