On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 07:18:59AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
This reverts commit 62aad93f09c1952ede86405894df1b22012fd5ab.
Which was upstream commit 172b06c32b94 ("mm: slowly shrink slabs with a
relatively small number of objects").
The upstream commit was found to cause regressions. While there is a
proposed fix upstream, revent this patch from stable trees for now as
testing the fix will take some time.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index fc0436407471..03822f86f288 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -386,17 +386,6 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
delta = freeable >> priority;
delta *= 4;
do_div(delta, shrinker->seeks);
-
- /*
- * Make sure we apply some minimal pressure on default priority
- * even on small cgroups. Stale objects are not only consuming memory
- * by themselves, but can also hold a reference to a dying cgroup,
- * preventing it from being reclaimed. A dying cgroup with all
- * corresponding structures like per-cpu stats and kmem caches
- * can be really big, so it may lead to a significant waste of memory.
- */
- delta = max_t(unsigned long long, delta, min(freeable, batch_size));
-
total_scan += delta;
if (total_scan < 0) {
pr_err("shrink_slab: %pF negative objects to delete nr=%ld\n",
I've queued it up for 4.18.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
