Re: [PATCH 1/5] vmscan: remove all_unreclaimable check from direct reclaim path completely

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:28 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> For example, In 4G desktop system.
>>> 32M full scanning and fail to reclaim a page.
>>> It's under 1% coverage.
>>
>> ?? I'm sorry. I haven't catch it.
>> Where 32M come from?
>
> (1<<12) * 4K + (1<<11) + 4K + .. (1 << 0) + 4K in shrink_zones.

Stupid me.
Sorry. my calculation is totally wrong.

Your explanation was perfect
Okay. I don't have any objection to your solution.



-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]