On Wed 24-10-18 01:39:18, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 10:23 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 23-10-18 23:26:16, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 08:15 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Wed 24-10-18 10:47:52, Arun KS wrote: > > > > > On 2018-10-24 01:34, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > Thank you -- I was struggling to figure out the best way to reply to > > > > > > this. :) > > > > > I'm sorry for the trouble caused. Sent the email using, > > > > > git send-email --to-cmd="scripts/get_maintainer.pl -i" > > > > > 0001-convert-totalram_pages-totalhigh_pages-and-managed_p.patch > > > > > > > > > > Is this not a recommended approach? > > > > > > > > Not really for tree wide mechanical changes. It is much more preferrable > > > > IMHO to only CC people who should review the intention of the change > > > > rather than each and every maintainer whose code is going to be changed. > > > > This is a case by case thing of course but as soon as you see a giant CC > > > > list from get_maintainer.pl then you should try to think twice to use > > > > it. If not sure, just ask on the mailing list. > > > > > > Generally, it's better to use scripts to control > > > the --to-cmd and --cc-cmd options. > > > > I would argue that it is better to use a common sense much more than > > scripts. > > Common sense isn't common. But you cannot replace brain by a script. Again, this is mostly a mechanical change quite internal to the MM proper. Involving all the maintainers which happen to use totalram_pages etc. are unlikely to need to know about this change. Sure there is some chance of merge conflicts and that is where linux-next comes really handy. This is the best advice I can give here. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs