Re: [PATCH 1/5] vmscan: remove all_unreclaimable check from direct reclaim path completely

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:11:46 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Subject: [PATCH] vmscan: remove all_unreclaimable check from direct reclaim path completely
> 
> zone.all_unreclaimable is there to prevent reclaim from wasting CPU
> cycles scanning a zone which has no reclaimable pages.  When originally
> implemented it did this very well.
>
> That you guys keep breaking it, or don't feel like improving it is not a
> reason to remove it!
> 
> If the code is unneeded and the kernel now reliably solves this problem
> by other means then this should have been fully explained in the
> changelog, but it was not even mentioned.

The changelog says, the logic was removed at 2008. three years ago.
even though it's unintentionally. and I and minchan tried to resurrect
the broken logic and resurrected a bug in the logic too. then, we
are discussed it should die or alive.

Which part is hard to understand for you?



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]