Re: [PATCH 1/5] vmscan: remove all_unreclaimable check from direct reclaim path completely

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Boo.
> > You seems forgot why you introduced current all_unreclaimable() function.
> > While hibernation, we can't trust all_unreclaimable.
> 
> Hmm. AFAIR, the why we add all_unreclaimable is when the hibernation is going on,
> kswapd is freezed so it can't mark the zone->all_unreclaimable.
> So I think hibernation can't be a problem.
> Am I miss something?

Ahh, I missed. thans correct me. Okay, I recognized both mine and your works.
Can you please explain why do you like your one than mine?

btw, Your one is very similar andrey's initial patch. If your one is
better, I'd like to ack with andrey instead.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]