On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > I.e. the benefits vs drawbacks of higher order allocations for SLAB are > out of scope here. It would be nice if somebody evaluated them, but the > potential resulting change would be much larger than what concerns this > patch. But it would arguably also make SLAB more like SLUB, which you > already questioned at some point... Well if this leads to more code going into mm/slab_common.c then I would certainly welcome that.
