Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/32: Fix setup of CS high bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13.10.18 17:12, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 3:02 AM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxx> wrote:

From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Even if we are not on an entry stack, we have to initialize the CS high
bits because we are unconditionally evaluating them
PARANOID_EXIT_TO_KERNEL_MODE. Failing to do so broke the boot on Galileo
Gen2 and IOT2000 boards.

Fixes: b92a165df17e ("x86/entry/32: Handle Entry from Kernel-Mode on Entry-Stack")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 12 ++++++------
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
index 2767c625a52c..95c94d48ecd2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
@@ -389,6 +389,12 @@
          * that register for the time this macro runs
          */

+       /*
+        * Clear unused upper bits of the dword containing the word-sized CS
+        * slot in pt_regs in case hardware didn't clear it for us.
+        */
+       andl    $(0x0000ffff), PT_CS(%esp)
+

Please improve the comment. Since commit:

commit 385eca8f277c4c34f361a4c3a088fd876d29ae21
Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jul 28 06:00:30 2017 -0700

     x86/asm/32: Make pt_regs's segment registers be 16 bits

Those fields are genuinely 16 bit.  So the comment should say
something like "Those high bits are used for CS_FROM_ENTRY_STACK and
CS_FROM_USER_CR3".

/*
 * The high bits of the CS dword (__csh) are used for
 * CS_FROM_ENTRY_STACK and CS_FROM_USER_CR3. Clear them in case
 * hardware didn't do this for us.
 */

OK? I will send out v2 with this wording soon.


Also, can you fold something like this in:

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
index 2767c625a52c..358eed8cf62a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
         ALTERNATIVE "jmp .Lend_\@", "", X86_FEATURE_PTI
         .if \no_user_check == 0
         /* coming from usermode? */
-       testl   $SEGMENT_RPL_MASK, PT_CS(%esp)
+       testb   $SEGMENT_RPL_MASK, PT_CS(%esp)
         jz      .Lend_\@
         .endif
         /* On user-cr3? */


Makes sense, but this looks like a separate patch to me.

Jan

--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux