Palmer
> I don't really know anything about this, but you're welcome to add a
>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks. I think it would be good to get someone who's familiar with linux/mm to take a look.
> if you think it'll help. I'm assuming you're targeting a different tree for
> the patch set, in which case it's probably best to keep this together with the
> rest of it.
No I think this series should be pulled by the RISC-V maintainer. The other patches in this series just refactor some code and need to be ACK'ed by their ARCH developers but I suspect the series should be pulled into RISC-V. That said since it does touch other arch should it be pulled by mm?
BTW note that RISC-V SPARSEMEM support is pretty useful for all manner of things and not just the p2pdma discussed in the cover.
> Thanks for porting your stuff to RISC-V!
You bet ;-)
Stephen
