On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2011-03-22 (í), 08:59 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki: > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:54:15 +0900 > > Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > What is the benefit of this patch ? > > > > -Kame > > > > Oh, I just thought generally it'd better call such a (potentially) > costly function outside of locks and it could reduce few of theoretical > contentions between swapons and/or offs. If it doesn't help any > realistic cases I don't mind discarding it. swapoff is a rare path, I would not worry about it too much at all. Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href