Re: [PATCH] mm, oom_adj: avoid meaningless loop to find processes sharing mm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 09-10-18 21:52:12, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/10/09 20:10, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 09-10-18 19:00:44, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >>> 2) add OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN and do not kill tasks sharing mm and do not
> >>> reap the mm in the rare case of the race.
> >>
> >> That is no problem. The mistake we made in 4.6 was that we updated oom_score_adj
> >> to -1000 (and allowed unprivileged users to OOM-lockup the system).
> > 
> > I do not follow.
> > 
> 
> http://tomoyo.osdn.jp/cgi-bin/lxr/source/mm/oom_kill.c?v=linux-4.6.7#L493

Ahh, so you are not referring to the current upstream code. Do you see
any specific problem with the current one (well, except for the possible
race which I have tried to evaluate).
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux