Re: block: DMA alignment of IO buffer allocated from slab

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/24/18 2:46 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
On 09/24/2018 01:42 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 03:04:18PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes:

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:15:43PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
1) does kmalloc-N slab guarantee to return N-byte aligned buffer?  If
yes, is it a stable rule?

This is the assumption in a lot of the kernel, so I think if somethings
breaks this we are in a lot of pain.

This assumption is not correct. And it's not correct at least from the beginning of the
git era, which is even before SLUB allocator appeared. With CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y
the same as with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y kmalloc return 'unaligned' objects.
The guaranteed arch-and-config-independent alignment of kmalloc() result is "sizeof(void*)".

If objects has higher alignment requirement, the could be allocated via specifically created kmem_cache.

Hello Andrey,

The above confuses me. Can you explain to me why the following comment is present in include/linux/slab.h?

/*
 * kmalloc and friends return ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN aligned
 * pointers. kmem_cache_alloc and friends return ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
 * aligned pointers.
 */

Thanks,

Bart.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux