Hi Jonathan,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:04:49AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 18:59:18 +0300
> Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > All architecures use memblock for early memory management. There is no need
> > for the CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> A minor editing issue in here that is stopping boot on arm64 platforms with latest
> version of the mm tree.
Can you please try the following patch:
>From 079bd5d24a01df3df9500d0a33d89cb9f7da4588 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:29:27 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] of/fdt: fixup #ifdefs after removal of HAVE_MEMBLOCK config
option
The removal of HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option, mistakenly dropped the
wrong #endif. This patch restores that #endif and removes the part that
should have been actually removed, starting from #else and up to the
correct #endif
Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/of/fdt.c | 21 +--------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
index 48314e9..bb532aa 100644
--- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
@@ -1119,6 +1119,7 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
#endif
#ifndef MAX_MEMBLOCK_ADDR
#define MAX_MEMBLOCK_ADDR ((phys_addr_t)~0)
+#endif
void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
{
@@ -1175,26 +1176,6 @@ int __init __weak early_init_dt_reserve_memory_arch(phys_addr_t base,
return memblock_reserve(base, size);
}
-#else
-void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
-{
- WARN_ON(1);
-}
-
-int __init __weak early_init_dt_mark_hotplug_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
-{
- return -ENOSYS;
-}
-
-int __init __weak early_init_dt_reserve_memory_arch(phys_addr_t base,
- phys_addr_t size, bool nomap)
-{
- pr_err("Reserved memory not supported, ignoring range %pa - %pa%s\n",
- &base, &size, nomap ? " (nomap)" : "");
- return -ENOSYS;
-}
-#endif
-
static void * __init early_init_dt_alloc_memory_arch(u64 size, u64 align)
{
return memblock_alloc(size, align);
--
2.7.4
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > index 76c83c1..bd841bb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > @@ -1115,13 +1115,11 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> > #ifndef MIN_MEMBLOCK_ADDR
> > #define MIN_MEMBLOCK_ADDR __pa(PAGE_OFFSET)
> > #endif
> > #ifndef MAX_MEMBLOCK_ADDR
> > #define MAX_MEMBLOCK_ADDR ((phys_addr_t)~0)
> > -#endif
>
> This isn't the right #endif. It is matching with the #ifndef MAX_MEMBLOCK_ADDR
> not the intented #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK.
>
> Now I haven't chased through the exact reason this is causing my acpi
> arm64 system not to boot on the basis it is obviously miss-matched anyway
> and I'm inherently lazy. It's resulting in stubs replacing the following weak
> functions.
>
> early_init_dt_add_memory_arch
> (this is defined elsewhere for some architectures but not arm)
>
> early_init_dt_mark_hotplug_memory_arch
> (there is only one definition of this in the kernel so it doesn't
> need to be weak or in the header etc).
>
> early_init_dt_reserve_memory_arch
> (defined on mips but nothing else)
>
> Taking out the right endif also lets you drop an #else removing some stub
> functions further down in here.
>
> Nice cleanup in general btw.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
> >
> > void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
> > {
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
