On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:12:22 +0200 Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:58:10PM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote: > > The machines where I have PAE off are the ones that have less memory. > > PAE is off just for performance reasons, not lack of PAE. PAE should be > > present on all of my affected machines anyway and current distributions > > seem to mostly assume 686 and PAE anyway for 32-bit systems. > > Right, most distributions don't even provide a non-PAE kernel for their > users anymore. > > How big is the performance impact of using PAE over legacy paging? On what system. In the days of the original 36bit PAE Xeons it was around 10% when we measured it at Red Hat, but that was long ago and as you go newer it really ought to be vanishingly small. There are pretty much no machines that don't support PAE and are still even vaguely able to boot a modern Linux kernel. The oddity is the Pentium-M but most distros shipped a hack to use PAE on the Pentium M anyway as it seems to work fine. Alan
