Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> writes:
> Le 17/09/2018 à 11:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm having a hard time figuring out the best way to handle the following
>>> situation:
>>>
>>> On the powerpc8xx, handling 16k size pages requires to have page tables
>>> with 4 identical entries.
>>
>> I assume that hugetlb page size? If so isn't that similar to FSL hugetlb
>> page table layout?
>
> No, it is not for 16k hugepage size with a standard page size of 4k.
>
> Here I'm trying to handle the case of CONFIG_PPC_16K_PAGES.
> As of today, it is implemented by using the standard Linux page layout,
> ie one PTE entry for each 16k page. This forbids the use the 8xx HW
> assistance.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Initially I was thinking about handling this by simply modifying
>>> pte_index() which changing pte_t type in order to have one entry every
>>> 16 bytes, then replicate the PTE value at *ptep, *ptep+1,*ptep+2 and
>>> *ptep+3 both in set_pte_at() and pte_update().
>>>
>>> However, this doesn't work because many many places in the mm core part
>>> of the kernel use loops on ptep with single ptep++ increment.
>>>
>>> Therefore did it with the following hack:
>>>
>>> /* PTE level */
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && defined(CONFIG_PPC_16K_PAGES)
>>> +typedef struct { pte_basic_t pte, pte1, pte2, pte3; } pte_t;
>>> +#else
>>> typedef struct { pte_basic_t pte; } pte_t;
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> @@ -181,7 +192,13 @@ static inline unsigned long pte_update(pte_t *p,
>>> : "cc" );
>>> #else /* PTE_ATOMIC_UPDATES */
>>> unsigned long old = pte_val(*p);
>>> - *p = __pte((old & ~clr) | set);
>>> + unsigned long new = (old & ~clr) | set;
>>> +
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && defined(CONFIG_PPC_16K_PAGES)
>>> + p->pte = p->pte1 = p->pte2 = p->pte3 = new;
>>> +#else
>>> + *p = __pte(new);
>>> +#endif
>>> #endif /* !PTE_ATOMIC_UPDATES */
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_44x
>>>
>>>
>>> @@ -161,7 +161,11 @@ static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct
>>> *mm, unsigned long addr,
>>> /* Anything else just stores the PTE normally. That covers all
>>> 64-bit
>>> * cases, and 32-bit non-hash with 32-bit PTEs.
>>> */
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && defined(CONFIG_PPC_16K_PAGES)
>>> + ptep->pte = ptep->pte1 = ptep->pte2 = ptep->pte3 = pte_val(pte);
>>> +#else
>>> *ptep = pte;
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But I'm not too happy with it as it means pte_t is not a single type
>>> anymore so passing it from one function to the other is quite heavy.
>>>
>>>
>>> Would someone have an idea of an elegent way to handle that ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Christophe
>>
>> Why would pte_update bother about updating all the 4 entries?. Can you
>> help me understand the issue?
>
> Because the 8xx HW assistance expects 4 identical entries for each 16k
> page, so everytime a PTE is updated the 4 entries have to be updated.
>
What you suggested in the original mail is what matches that best isn't it?
That is a linux pte update involves updating 4 slot. Hence a linux pte
consist of 4 unsigned long?
-aneesh
