Re: ext4 hang and per-memcg dirty throttling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

On Tue 11-09-18 17:10:55, Liu Bo wrote:
> With ext4's data=ordered mode and the underlying blk throttle setting, we
> can easily run to hang,
> 
> 1.
> mount /dev/sdc /mnt -odata=ordered
> 2.
> mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cg
> 3.
> echo "+io" > /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.subtree_control
> 4.
> echo "`cat /sys/block/sdc/dev` wbps=$((1 << 20))" > /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cg/io.max
> 5.
> echo $$ >  /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cg/cgroup.procs
> 6.
> // background dirtier
> xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 1G" $M/dummy &
> 7.
> echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.procs
> 8.
> // issue synchronous IO
> for i in `seq 1 100`;
> do
>     xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite 0 4k" $M/foo > /dev/null
> done
> 
> 
> And the hang is like
> 
>       [jbd2-sdc]
> jbd2_journal_commit_transaction                              
>   journal_submit_data_buffers
>     # file 'dummy' has been written by writeback kthread
>   journal_finish_inode_data_buffers
>     # wait on page's writeback

Yes, I guess you're speaking about the one Chris Mason mentioned [1].
Essentially it's a priority inversion where jbd2 thread gets blocked behind
writeback done on behalf of a heavily restricted process. It actually is
not related to dirty throttling or anything like that. And the solution for
this priority inversion is to use unwritten extents for writeback
unconditionally as I wrote in that thread. The core of this is implemented
and hidden behind dioread_nolock mount option but it needs some serious
polishing work and testing...

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=151688776319077

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux