Re: [PATCH v2 2.6.38-rc8-tip 7/20] 7: uprobes: store/restore original instruction.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-03-15 15:41:20]:

> On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> >  static int install_uprobe(struct mm_struct *mm, struct uprobe *uprobe)
> >  {
> > -	int ret = 0;
> > +	struct task_struct *tsk;
> > +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -	/*TODO: install breakpoint */
> > -	if (!ret)
> > +	get_task_struct(mm->owner);
> 
> Increment task ref before checking for NULL ?

In response to earlier comments/suggestions from Stephen Wilson, we
resolved to handle it this way 


static uprobes_get_mm_owner() {
	struct task_struct *tsk; 

	rcu_read_lock()
	tsk = rcu_dereference(mm->owner);
	if (tsk)
		get_task_struct(tsk);	
	rcu_read_unlock();
	return tsk;
}

Both install_uprobe and remove_uprobe will end up calling uprobes_get_mm_owner().


-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]