* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-03-15 15:41:20]: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > static int install_uprobe(struct mm_struct *mm, struct uprobe *uprobe) > > { > > - int ret = 0; > > + struct task_struct *tsk; > > + int ret = -EINVAL; > > > > - /*TODO: install breakpoint */ > > - if (!ret) > > + get_task_struct(mm->owner); > > Increment task ref before checking for NULL ? In response to earlier comments/suggestions from Stephen Wilson, we resolved to handle it this way static uprobes_get_mm_owner() { struct task_struct *tsk; rcu_read_lock() tsk = rcu_dereference(mm->owner); if (tsk) get_task_struct(tsk); rcu_read_unlock(); return tsk; } Both install_uprobe and remove_uprobe will end up calling uprobes_get_mm_owner(). -- Thanks and Regards Srikar -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>