Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:45 AM Julian Stecklina <jsteckli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I've been spending some cycles on the XPFO patch set this week. For the >> patch set as it was posted for v4.13, the performance overhead of >> compiling a Linux kernel is ~40% on x86_64[1]. The overhead comes almost >> completely from TLB flushing. If we can live with stale TLB entries >> allowing temporary access (which I think is reasonable), we can remove >> all TLB flushing (on x86). This reduces the overhead to 2-3% for >> kernel compile. > > I have to say, even 2-3% for a kernel compile sounds absolutely horrendous. Well, it's at least in a range where it doesn't look hopeless. > Kernel bullds are 90% user space at least for me, so a 2-3% slowdown > from a kernel is not some small unnoticeable thing. The overhead seems to come from the hooks that XPFO adds to alloc/free_pages. These hooks add a couple of atomic operations per allocated (4K) page for book keeping. Some of these atomic ops are only for debugging and could be removed. There is also some opportunity to streamline the per-page space overhead of XPFO. I'll do some more in-depth profiling later this week. Julian Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH Berlin - Dresden - Aachen main office: Krausenstr. 38, 10117 Berlin Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dr. Ralf Herbrich, Christian Schlaeger Ust-ID: DE289237879 Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B