On 03/11/2011 01:43 PM, Greg Thelen wrote:
Add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty page limits: Direct write-out is controlled with: - memory.dirty_ratio - memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes Background write-out is controlled with: - memory.dirty_background_ratio - memory.dirty_background_limit_bytes
What's the overlap, if any, with the current memory limits controlled by `memory.limit_in_bytes` and the above `memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes`? If I want to fairly balance memory between two cgroups be one a dirty page antagonist (dd) and the other an anonymous page (memcache), do I just set `memory.limit_in_bytes`? Does this patch simply provide a more granular level of control of the dirty limits?
Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>