> > > uprobes and then draft a proposal for how the syscall should look. > > There are still some areas on how we should be allowing the > > filter, and what restrictions we should place on the syscall > > defined handler. I would like to hear from you and others on your > > ideas for the same. If you have ideas on doing it other than using a > > syscall then please do let me know about the same. > > I don't think that anything else than a proper syscall interface is > going to work out. Okay, > > > I know that getting the user interface right is very important. > > However I think it kind of depends on what the infrastructure can > > provide too. So if we can decide on the kernel ABI and the > > underlying design (i.e can we use replace_page() based background page > > replacement, Are there issues with the Xol slot based mechanism that > > we are using, etc), we can work towards providing a stable User ABI that > > even normal users can use. For now I am concentrating on getting the > > underlying infrastructure correct. > > Fair enough. I'll go through the existing patchset and comment there. > Thanks for taking a look at the code. Look forward for your comments. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>