I guess the wrap was done because of __ref, but no reason to have this
wrap. So looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 8/16/18 6:06 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's avoid this indirection and just call the function offline_pages().
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 13 +++----------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 6a2726920ed2..090cf474de87 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1589,10 +1589,10 @@ static void node_states_clear_node(int node, struct memory_notify *arg)
> node_clear_state(node, N_MEMORY);
> }
>
> -static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
> - unsigned long end_pfn)
> +/* Must be protected by mem_hotplug_begin() or a device_lock */
> +int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> - unsigned long pfn, nr_pages;
> + unsigned long pfn, end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
> long offlined_pages;
> int ret, node;
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -1612,7 +1612,6 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
>
> zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(valid_start));
> node = zone_to_nid(zone);
> - nr_pages = end_pfn - start_pfn;
>
> /* set above range as isolated */
> ret = start_isolate_page_range(start_pfn, end_pfn,
> @@ -1700,12 +1699,6 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
> undo_isolate_page_range(start_pfn, end_pfn, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
> return ret;
> }
> -
> -/* Must be protected by mem_hotplug_begin() or a device_lock */
> -int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> -{
> - return __offline_pages(start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages);
> -}
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
>
> /**
>
