Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Clean up check_for_memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:35:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > First, we should only set N_HIGH_MEMORY in case we have
> > CONFIG_HIGHMEM.
> 
> Why?  Just a teeny optimization?

Hi Andrew,

Optimization was not really my point here, my point was to make
the code less subtle and more clear.
One may wonder why we set N_HIGH_MEMORY unconditionally when
__only__ CONFIG_HIGHMEM matters for this case, and why we set 
N_NORMAL_MEMORY __only__ for CONFIG_HIGHMEM when we should not care
about that at all.

I do not really expect a big impact here, mainly because check_for_memory
is only being used during boot.

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux