On Tue 28-08-18 17:42:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 28-08-18 11:36:59, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:24:14PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Fri 24-08-18 20:05:46, Zi Yan wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > + if (!pmd_present(pmd)) {
> > > > > + swp_entry_t entry = pmd_to_swp_entry(pmd);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (is_migration_entry(entry)) {
> > > >
> > > > I think you should check thp_migration_supported() here, since PMD migration is only enabled in x86_64 systems.
> > > > Other architectures should treat PMD migration entries as bad.
> > >
> > > How can we have a migration pmd entry when the migration is not
> > > supported?
> >
> > Not sure i follow here, migration can happen anywhere (assuming
> > that something like compaction is active or numa or ...). So this
> > code can face pmd migration entry on architecture that support
> > it. What is missing here is thp_migration_supported() call to
> > protect the is_migration_entry() to avoid false positive on arch
> > which do not support thp migration.
>
> I mean that architectures which do not support THP migration shouldn't
> ever see any migration entry. So is_migration_entry should be always
> false. Or do I miss something?
And just to be clear. thp_migration_supported should be checked only
when we actually _do_ the migration or evaluate migratability of the
page. We definitely do want to sprinkle this check to all places where
is_migration_entry is checked.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
