Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/sparse: expand the CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME range in __nr_to_section()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/23/2018 06:21 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1155,9 +1155,9 @@ static inline struct mem_section *__nr_to_section(unsigned long nr)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
>  	if (!mem_section)
>  		return NULL;
> -#endif
>  	if (!mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)])
>  		return NULL;
> +#endif
>  	return &mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)][nr & SECTION_ROOT_MASK];
>  }

This patch has no practical effect and only adds unnecessary churn.

#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
...
#else
struct mem_section mem_section[NR_SECTION_ROOTS][SECTIONS_PER_ROOT];
#endif

The compiler knows that NR_SECTION_ROOTS==1 and that
!mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr) is always false.  It doesn't need
our help.

My goal with the sparsemem code, and code in general is t avoid #ifdefs
whenever possible and limit their scope to the smallest possible area
whenever possible.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux