measuring reclaim overhead without NR_PAGES_SCANNED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My apologies for not noticing this earlier, but we're often working
with older kernels.

On May 3, 2017 this patch was merged:

commit c822f6223d03c2c5b026a21da09c6b6d523258cd
Author:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed May 3 14:52:10 2017 -0700
Commit:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed May 3 15:52:08 2017 -0700

    mm: delete NR_PAGES_SCANNED and pgdat_reclaimable()

I was planning to use this number as a measure of how much work the
kernel was doing trying to reclaim pages (by comparing it, for
instance, to the number of pages actually swapped in).  I am not even
sure how good a metric this would be.  Does anybody have suggestions
for a good (or better) replacement?

Thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux