On 13.08.2018 17:46, osalvador@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
>
> Before calling to unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(),
> remove_memory_section() already checks if we got a valid
> memory_block.
>
> No need to check that again in unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes().
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/base/node.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index 1ac4c36e13bb..dd3bdab230b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -455,10 +455,6 @@ int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
> NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL);
> unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn;
>
> - if (!mem_blk) {
> - NODEMASK_FREE(unlinked_nodes);
> - return -EFAULT;
> - }
> if (!unlinked_nodes)
> return -ENOMEM;
> nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes);
>
While it is correct in current code, I wonder if this sanity check
should stay. I would completely agree if it would be a static function.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
