On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:17:44PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > On 08.08.2018 10:20, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 07-08-18 18:37:36, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > >> This patch kills all CONFIG_SRCU defines and > >> the code under !CONFIG_SRCU. > > > > The last time somebody tried to do this there was a pushback due to > > kernel tinyfication. So this should really give some numbers about the > > code size increase. Also why can't we make this depend on MMU. Is > > anybody else than the reclaim asking for unconditional SRCU usage? > > I don't know one. The size numbers (sparc64) are: > > $ size image.srcu.disabled > text data bss dec hex filename > 5117546 8030506 1968104 15116156 e6a77c image.srcu.disabled > $ size image.srcu.enabled > text data bss dec hex filename > 5126175 8064346 1968104 15158625 e74d61 image.srcu.enabled > The difference is: 15158625-15116156 = 42469 ~41Kb 41k is a *substantial* size increase. However, can you compare tinyconfig with and without this patch? That may have a smaller change.
