On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:15:29 -0700 Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > mem_cgroup_print_oom_info() currently prints the same info for cgroup1 > and cgroup2 OOMs. It doesn't make much sense on cgroup2, which > doesn't use memsw or separate kmem accounting - the information > reported is both superflous and insufficient. This patch updates the > memcg OOM messages on cgroup2 so that > > * It prints memory and swap usages and limits used on cgroup2. > > * It shows the same information as memory.stat. > > I took out the recursive printing for cgroup2 because the amount of > output could be a lot and the benefits aren't clear. An example dump > follows. This conflicts rather severely with Shakeel's "memcg: reduce memcg tree traversals for stats collection". Can we please park this until after 4.19-rc1?
