Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: update memcg OOM messages on cgroup2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 01:30:49PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 10:57:43AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "pgfault %lu\n", events[PGFAULT]);
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "pgmajfault %lu\n", events[PGMAJFAULT]);
> > +
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "pgrefill %lu\n", events[PGREFILL]);
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "pgscan %lu\n", events[PGSCAN_KSWAPD] +
> > +		    events[PGSCAN_DIRECT]);
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "pgsteal %lu\n", events[PGSTEAL_KSWAPD] +
> > +		    events[PGSTEAL_DIRECT]);
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "pgactivate %lu\n", events[PGACTIVATE]);
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "pgdeactivate %lu\n", events[PGDEACTIVATE]);
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "pglazyfree %lu\n", events[PGLAZYFREE]);
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "pglazyfreed %lu\n", events[PGLAZYFREED]);
> >  
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "workingset_refault %lu\n",
> > +		    stat[WORKINGSET_REFAULT]);
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "workingset_activate %lu\n",
> > +		    stat[WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE]);
> > +	seq_pr_info(m, "workingset_nodereclaim %lu\n",
> > +		    stat[WORKINGSET_NODERECLAIM]);
> 
> I'm not sure we need all theses stats in the oom report.
> I'd drop the events part.

This info dump usually races with ongoing reclaim and frees. The VM
state might have changed quite a bit by the time this is all written
out, which sometimes makes it hard to rootcause from just the state
snapshots. Knowing what the VM was doing before the OOM is helpful.

I'd prefer we keep those in.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux