Re: [PATCH] mm: Use special value SHRINKER_REGISTERING instead list_empty() check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 08:30:43AM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 05.08.2018 03:03, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 09:42:05PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >> This is exactly the thing the patch makes. Instead of inserting a shrinker pointer
> >> to idr, it inserts a fake value SHRINKER_REGISTERING there. The patch makes impossible
> >> to dereference a shrinker unless it's completely registered. 
> > 
> > -       id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, SHRINKER_REGISTERING, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 
> > Instead:
> > 
> > +       id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, NULL, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 
> > ... and the rest of your patch becomes even simpler.
> 
> The patch, we are discussing at the moment, does *exactly* this:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/3/588
> 
> It looks like you missed this hunk in the patch.

No, it does this:

+       id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, SHRINKER_REGISTERING, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);

I'm saying do this:

+       id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, NULL, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux